Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wasia Maya v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-3337
Petitioner:
WASIA K. MAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of ICE, HENRY LUCERO, ICE Chicago Field Office Director and others
Seidu Iddrissu, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEIDU IDDRISSU and ROBIN SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, KEVIN RIDDLE, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and DAVID H. WETMORE, Chairman, Board of Immigration Appeals
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geogy George v. Ruth Dorochoff, et al
as 11-2655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOGY GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH A. DOROCHOFF, JANET A. NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and ROBERT MUELLER, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
