Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09971
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-56079
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56276
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56250
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Udon Lertjanthuk v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2016cv00511
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Secretary of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Udon Lertjanthuk
Cesar Paz Negrete v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2016cv00003
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Secretary of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Cesar Paz Negrete
Gerardo Mendoza Lopez v. Jeh Johnson, et al
as 14-16196
Petitioner - Appellee:
GERARDO MANUEL MENDOZA LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellant:
JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, TIMOTHY S. AITKEN, Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Phu Nay v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 14-55701
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHU LUC NAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General and TROY LUND, Los Angeles Field Office Director for ICE
Phu Nay v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 13-55994
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHU LUC NAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and TROY LUND, Los Angeles Field Office Director for ICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
