Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Romero's Food Products, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02892
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Romero's Food Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Loyola Salina et al
as 2:2023cv00541
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Ana Loyola Salina, Active Life Apparel, Inc. and Active Life Apparel, Inc. a corporation doing business as Active Life Apparel, Inc.
Martin J. Walsh v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local No. 18
as 2:2021cv08059
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Martin J. Walsh
Respondent:
International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local No. 18
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Martin J. Walsh v. Jolie Clothing, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04792
Defendant:
Jolie Clothing, Inc. and Joseph Yi
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund et al v. R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Petitioner:
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund , Edward R. Lenhart, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Chuck Mack, individually and in his capacity as Co-Chairman/Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Respondent:
R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Klaus Placke, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director, United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
