Cases 1 - 7 of 7
USA v. $8000.00 in United States Currency From Eight United States Postal Service Money Orders
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$8000.00 in United States Currency From Eight United States Postal Service Money Orders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. $7,880.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$7,880.00 in United States Currency and $4,900.00 in United States Postal Service Money Orders
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ingram v. Internal Revenue Services (IRS)
as 5:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Michael Ingram
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Services (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $6,080.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2015cv00213
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$6,080.00 in United States Currency and $1,000.00 United States Postal Service Money Order
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Dailey v. United States Postal Inspection Services
as 3:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Paul Dailey
Defendant:
United States Postal Inspection Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Contents of Bank Account #XXXXXXXX5267 in the Name of Universal of Work Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Contents of Bank Account #XXXXXXXX5267 in the Name of Universal of Work Services, Inc., Contents of Bank Account #XXXXXX4578 in the Name of Nashville Best Services, Inc. and Contents of Bank Account #XXXXX6779 in the Name of Newburg Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Lamb v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service et al
as 5:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Penny Lamb
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
