Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01484
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hellrigel v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited et al
as 3:2026cv01487
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Hellrigel
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Limited, Corebridge Institutional Investments Holdings Corp., Next Level Business Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Barr v. State of Connecticut Department of Developmental Services
as 3:2026cv01468
Plaintiff:
Josephine Barr
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Department of Developmental Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Loschiavo v. Lincare Inc.
as 3:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
Carley Loschiavo
Defendant:
Lincare Inc. d/b/a J & L Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
