Cases 31 - 40 of 218
NASH v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02111
Plaintiff:
JAMICE NASH
Defendant:
JAMES KENNEY, SETH WILLIAMS, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. MCGINETLY et al
as 2:2017cv02113
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LANE
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINETLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv01615
Petitioner:
BARBARA BRYANT
Respondent:
SETH WILLIAMS, JAQUAN LIGHTFOOT and THE ATTORNEYGENRAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NASH v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
JAMEICE NASH
Defendant:
JAMES KENNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. STREET et. al.
as 2:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
JAMES GIBSON
Defendant:
SIERRA THOMAS STREET
Thirdparty_defendant:
RUFUS SETH WILLIAMS, RAYFORD MEANS and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv00761
Petitioner:
JEROME L. ROGERS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SETH WILLIAMS, GIOVANNI CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00491
Petitioner:
DAVID JACKSON
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PHOMMA v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00499
Petitioner:
KHAMPHOY PHOMMA
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, R. SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00443
Petitioner:
MELVIN WHITE
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHESTNUT v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. CHESTNUT
Defendant:
LINDA A. CARPENTER, ROBIN GODFREY, HUGH BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
