Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 285
PHOMMA v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00499
Petitioner: KHAMPHOY PHOMMA
Respondent: THERESA DELBALSO, R. SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. DELBALSO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00443
Petitioner: MELVIN WHITE
Respondent: TERESA DELBALSO, SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHESTNUT v. CARPENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00382
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. CHESTNUT
Defendant: LINDA A. CARPENTER, ROBIN GODFREY, HUGH BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELENDEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00289
Plaintiff: JULIO MELENDEZ
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, G. MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPURILL v. TRITT et al
as 2:2017cv00201
Petitioner: LAMAR TYREE SPURILL
Respondent: BRENDA TRITT, R. SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spurill v. Tritt et al
as 1:2017cv00048
Petitioner: Lamar Tyree Spurill
Respondent: Brenda Tritt, R. Seth Williams and Kathleen G. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MATTHEWS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2016cv06652
Plaintiff: KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2016cv06624
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. CHESTNUT
Defendant: LINDA A. CARPENTER, ROBIN GODFREY, HUGH BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOSNELL v. TICE et al
as 2:2016cv06506
Petitioner: KERMIT B. GOSNELL
Respondent: ERIC TICE, SETH WILLIAMS and BRUCE BEEMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMBERT v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv05790
Petitioner: ERIC X. RAMBERT
Respondent: MICHAEL OVERMYER, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?