Cases 51 - 60 of 79
K. K. v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv06167
Defendant:
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Sprouts Farmers Market, Does 1 to 50, inclusive, Sprouts Farmers Market and others
Plaintiff:
K. K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Celia Mazariegos v. SF Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04092
Petitioner:
Sprouts Farmers Markets LLC
Plaintiff:
Celia Mazariegos
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jutta Rohner v. SF Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03733
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SF Markets, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jutta Rohner
Cross Defendant:
Market Refrigeration Specialists, Inc. and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mazariegos et al
as 2:2020cv04090
Plaintiff:
Celia Mazariegos
Petitioner:
SF Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noelle Sheble v. Sprouts Farmers Market
as 5:2020cv00875
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC, DOES 1 to 20, inclusive and Sprouts Farmers Market
Plaintiff:
Noelle Sheble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gwendolyn Kennedy v. SF Markets LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00305
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
SF Markets LLC
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Kennedy
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mountain View Enterprises LP, Norwalk Flallon LLC, Roes and others
Defendant:
Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McShane v. SF Markets, LLC
as 5:2020cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gina McShane
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Nadene Chavez v. SF Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Nadene Chavez
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Deanna Cowell v. SF Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10975
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Deanna Cowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
