Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co v. FERC, et al
as 19-1086
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Not Yet Classified:
SFPP, L.P.
Petitioner:
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC
Valero Marketing and Supply Co v. FERC
as 19-1082
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Not Yet Classified:
SFPP, L.P.
Petitioner:
Valero Marketing and Supply Company
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. FERC, et al
as 19-1084
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Not Yet Classified:
SFPP, L.P.
Petitioner:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
American Airlines, Inc., et al v. FERC, et al
as 19-1077
Petitioner:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., American Airlines, Inc. and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Not Yet Classified:
Valero Marketing and Supply Company, Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC, Chevron Products Company and others
SFPP LP v. FERC, et al
as 19-1067
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Petitioner:
SFPP, L.P.
Undetermined:
Southwest Airlines Co., Valero Marketing and Supply Company, American Airlines, Inc. and others
Martin Wells, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 17-80098
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MARTIN WELLS, SUSAN WELLS, as Trustrees of the Martin and Susan Wells Revocable Trust and SANDRA L. HINSHAW, as Trustee of the Sandra L. Hinshaw Living Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to Southern Pacific Transportation Company, SFPP, L.P., formerly known as Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and others
James Mooney, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 17-80078
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL MOONEY and LAZY COYOTE RV VILLAGE, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, SFPP, L.P., formerly known as SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., formerly known as SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and others
Charles Serrano, et al v. UPRR, et al
as 16-56562
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES SERRANO, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, BARBARA SLOAN, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, COACHELLA SELF STORAGE, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Defendant:
SFPP, L.P., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC.
Charles Serrano, et al v. UPRR, et al
as 16-80101
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CHARLES SERRANO, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, BARBARA SLOAN, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, COACHELLA SELF STORAGE, LLC and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Defendant:
SFPP, L.P., other Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines Inc other Southern Pacific Pipelines Inc, KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
City of San Diego v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., et al
as 3:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
San Diego, The City of
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. , Kinder Morgan Management, L.L.C. , SFPP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
