Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Livingston et al
as 2:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard A. Livingston and Shari L. Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Thorne v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Thorne
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Shari L Gilman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Hofland et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lynn A Hofland , Dan E Hart , Sandra K Hart and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kaye et al v. Altendorf Trucking et al
as 2:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
Cheri Kaye , Joshua Ruman , Callie Ruman and others
Defendant:
Altendorf Trucking and Shari L. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kinyon v. All-Med Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Kinyon, . and Shari L. Kinyon, .
Defendant:
All-Med Inc and C. Jesse Peck
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0203 Equal Pay Act
Boeckman v. Dakil et al
as 4:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Brian Boeckman
Defendant:
Shari L Dakil, Gary Dakil, Raven Company, L.L.C., The and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Boeckman v. Dakil et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert Boeckman
Defendant:
Gary Dakil, Shari L Dakil, Jeffrey A Chubb and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
