Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LINDSEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv23287
Petitioner:
SIMONE LINDSEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RYAN O' DEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMON v. MACAULAY et al
as 1:2022cv06092
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. SIMON
Defendant:
GRACE MACAULAY, CYNTHIA JENTSCH RUSSOMANNO and CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv00489
Petitioner:
JOVAN CORNELIUS SIMON
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALLISTER v. UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv07655
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J BALLISTER, III
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE, JORGE JIMENEZ, ROBERT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMONS v. BUECHELE et al
as 1:2014cv07658
Petitioner:
DEWAYNE JEROME SIMONS
Respondent:
ROBERT BUECHELE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMONE v. LOURY
as 1:2013cv05095
Petitioner:
HARRY SIMONE
Respondent:
DERICK LOURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMON v. SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
as 3:2012cv04895
Plaintiff:
BASHON SIMON
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPEUT v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv01676
Petitioner:
ANDRE SIMON FITZGERALD ESPEUT
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMONE v. PARANTE et al
as 3:2012cv00934
Plaintiff:
HARRY TYLER SIMONE
Defendant:
BRIAN PARANTE and SUZANNE KOWALSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMONE v. PINCUS et al
as 3:2011cv05514
Plaintiff:
HARRY TYLER SIMONE
Defendant:
DIANE PINCUS, JOEL A. FRIEDMAN, ESQ., LYNN PILONE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
