Cases 41 - 50 of 72
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv01451
Petitioner:
ERIK ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUNN BEY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv01334
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. MUNN BEY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEVON BROWN, PAT BRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BETHEA
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCFADDEN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01198
Petitioner:
TRACY MCFADDEN
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURNEY v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01189
Petitioner:
JAMES BURNEY
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Petitioner:
MYRON CARTER
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Harris v. Efforts/EFEC 1/2 Way House, et al
as 10-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Edward Harris, also known as Bro. Abdul Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
Efforts/EFEC 1/2 Way House, Lt. Craig, Transportation Supervisor, DC Dept of Corrections/DC Jail, Kenard Johnson, Counselor and others
REED v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2010cv00807
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRIS v. EFFORTS/EFEC 1/2 WAY HOUSE et al
as 1:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. HARRIS
Defendant:
EFFORTS/EFEC 1/2 WAY HOUSE, LT CRAIG, KENARD JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. FENTY et al
as 1:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
EMMETT E. SPENCER
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY, DEVON BROWN, SIMON WAINWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
