Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Springfield Armory, Geneseo, IL Saint Rifle CAL: Multi SN: ST123995 et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Springfield Armory, Geneseo, IL Saint Rifle CAL: Multi SN: ST123995, 440 Rounds Assorted Ammunition CAL: Multi, Ruger New Vaquero Revolver CAL: .357 SN: 513-04970 and others
Claimant:
Stacey Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Taurus, Model Ultra Lite, 38 Special Caliber Revolver et al
as 1:2012cv00911
Defendant:
Taurus, Model Ultra Lite, 38 Special Caliber Revolver, Luger, Model CZ, .9mm Caliber Semi-automatic pistol, Savage, 402 Rifle and others
Claimant:
Eugenio Sanchez-Hernandez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. SKS Industries Inc.,
as 2:2007cv00893
Defendant:
SKS Industries, Inc., and SKS Industries, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc., Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. and Southwest Steel Coil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. SKS Industries Inc.,
as 1:2007cv00893
Defendant:
SKS Industries, Inc., and SKS Industries, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc., Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. and Southwest Steel Coil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. SKS Industries Inc.,
as 1:2007cv00893
Defendant:
SKS Industries, Inc., and SKS Industries, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Southwest Steel Coil, Inc., Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. and Southwest Steel Coil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
