Cases 1 - 10 of 386
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SMITH v. AFLAC, INC.
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
STEWART SMITH
Defendant:
AFLAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaunt v. Perry County Children and Youth Services et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dominique Plaunt
Defendant:
Perry County Children and Youth Services and John Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaunt v. Perry County Children and Youth Services et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Dominique Plaunt
Defendant:
Perry County Children and Youth Services and John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00006
Respondent:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv04848
Defendant:
SAMUEL JAMES SMITH ALSO doing business as WEBLIO also known as WEBLIO SQUEEZE, ROBERT WILLIAMS SHAFER ALSO doing business as SHAFER MM&I also known as MMI, WEBLIO SQUEEZE and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
The Hilb Group of Maryland, LLC v. Smith
as 4:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
The Hilb Group of Maryland, LLC
Defendant:
Tara Smith
SMITH v. DISCOUNT POWER, INC.
as 2:2023cv02670
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
DISCOUNT POWER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Palmco Power PA L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Palmco Power PA L.L.C. doing business as Indra Energy
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
