Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Darex, LLC v. Smith's Consumer Products, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC doing business as Work Sharp
Defendant:
Smith's Consumer Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Smith's Consumer Products, Inc. v. Gourmet Man, LLC
as 3:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Smith's Consumer Products, Inc
Defendant:
Gourmet Man, LLC doing business as BBQ Nation and Mitche Graf doing business as The Gourmet Man and BBQ Nation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Equine Legal Solutions, PC v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
Equine Legal Solutions, PC
Defendant:
Margaret A Johnson, Touchstone, Bernays, Johnston, Beall, Smith & Stollenwerck, L.L.P., Willow Draw, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Stross v. Smith Rock Masonry Company LLC
as 6:2019cv01394
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Smith Rock Masonry Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Triple Nickel Pub et al
as 3:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
Beechwood Music Corporation, Bernard Edwards Company LLC, Broadcast Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Fadi Naboulsi and Triple Nickel Pub, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
S.R. Smith, LLC v. Pentair, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01536
Defendant:
Pentair, Inc.
Plaintiff:
S.R. Smith, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Trebor Anthony LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00842
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Trebor Anthony LLC, Holly Sersansie, Mark Sersansie and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al v. Arthrex, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00714
Plaintiff:
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc., John O. Hayhurst and others
Defendant:
Arthrex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
