Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Gholson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2011cv03644
Plaintiff: Diane Gholson
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adamson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2010cv01066
Plaintiff: Dewayne Adamson
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2010cv02914
Plaintiff: Bruce Graham
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2010cv00311
Plaintiff: Marcia Davis and The Estate of James Raymond Callen
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00269
Plaintiff: Nellie R. Campbell
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bullard v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00265
Plaintiff: John Bullard
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearce v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00263
Plaintiff: William J. Pearce, Sr.
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doan v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff: Robert L. Doan
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00264
Plaintiff: Woodrow A. Jones
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00259
Plaintiff: Larry L. Davis
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?