Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Randall v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
Ti-Shika Andrea Randall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Randall v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00976
Plaintiff:
Ti-Shika Randall
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Huntington v. Colvin et al
as 8:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Christy R. Huntington
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross et al v. Broxton et al
as 8:2014cv02967
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Ross and Audrey Deloris Ross
Defendant:
R. Jeffries Broxton, Carolyn W. Colvin and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FLETCHER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 8:2014cv02948
Plaintiff:
Deborah Diane Fletcher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv02720
Plaintiff:
Kim Winkler
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Yi v. Social Security Administration et al
as 8:2014cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Iraheta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Gorham v. Social Security Administration
as 8:2013cv02109
Plaintiff:
Sylvia C. Gorham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
FLETCHER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 8:2012cv03780
Plaintiff:
Deborah Diane Fletcher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fletcher v. Social Security Administrational
as 8:2012cv03621
Plaintiff:
Deborah Diane Fletcher
Defendant:
Social Security Administrational
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
