Cases 11 - 18 of 18
SEYMOUR v. SCHULMAN et al
as 3:2009cv03847
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SEYMOUR
Defendant:
DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, THOMAS O. RYDER, RICHARD H. CHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
CUNEO-LEIDER MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 3:2008cv04621
Plaintiff:
CUNEO-LEIDER MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS, AT&T INC., SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
VOLPE v. SCHULMAN et al
as 2:2007cv05619
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VOLPE
Defendant:
DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, DOUGLAS B. LYNN, JONATHAN MARCHBANK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORP.
as 2:2007cv05432
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SAMPANG et al v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC et al
as 2:2007cv05325
Plaintiff:
YUNIS SAMPANG, JUDY LARSON, JOE MILLIRON and others
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al
as 3:2007cv04222
Plaintiff:
GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,, VERIZON WIRELESS, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Counter Claimant:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Counter Defendant:
GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
KALEJIAN et al v. SPRINT NEXTEL et al
as 2:2007cv02831
Plaintiff:
TONY KALEJIAN and HARETION KALEJIAN
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL, MOTOROLA INC., ABC CORP 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
