Cases 1 - 10 of 13
STARNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00820
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY DONALD STARNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24327
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nugent et al v. Merritt et al
as 8:2018cv00987
Plaintiff:
William Nugent , Ryah Vaaler , Karen Grigsby and others
Defendant:
Lynn Merritt and Annua Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARNER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00181
Petitioner:
RANDY STARNER
Respondent:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STARNER v. JONES
as 3:2015cv00044
Petitioner:
RANDY STARNER
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00839
Petitioner:
Randy Alan Starner
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00632
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starner v. State Of Florida
as 3:2008cv00528
Petitioner:
Randy Alan Starner
Respondent:
State Of Florida and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STARNER v. JENKINS
as 5:2007cv00256
Plaintiff:
RANDY ALAN STARNER
Defendant:
RUTH JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starner v. Jenkins
as 3:2007cv00989
Plaintiff:
Randy Alan Starner
Defendant:
Ruth Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
