Cases 1 - 10 of 635
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JORDAN A WATSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIWETHER v. GEORGIA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MERIWETHER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TYRONE OLIVER, COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
