Cases 1 - 10 of 15
May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 23-7011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
May Chen
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Police Department, Tilden Garden, Inc., West Covina State of California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUERTAS et al v. WARD et al
as 1:2019cv02570
Defendant:
MD M.C.S.O. EVICTION UNIT, STATE OF MARYLAND INC., JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ELSA HUERTAS and PABLO HUERTAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ASHFORD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02417
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LARRY VOLZ, DC PUBLIC LIBRARY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2018cv01639
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff:
CELESTE JONES and AUTUMN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAKEYE v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
DOTUN FAKEYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CIA, UNITES STATES POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2014cv01711
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. SANDERS
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD et al v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD, MICHAEL ALLEN and JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HAMILTON DAVY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MARYLAND, MUSKUS & MUSKUS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
