Cases 41 - 50 of 85
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Lindsay Jenkins
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 15-1396
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
Energy & Environment Legal Ins v. EPA
as 15-1397
Petitioner:
Energy & Environment Legal Institute
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of North Dakota v. EPA
as 15-1381
Petitioner:
State of North Dakota
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Lung Association, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council and others
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 14-5247
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Movant - Appellant:
Daniel J. Levitan
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 13-5112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P., formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
