Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CORDERO v. KELLEY et al
as 3:2017cv01596
Plaintiff:
MISAEL CORDERO
Defendant:
GREGORY KELLEY and STEPHEN D'LLIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAZUMOV et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv09221
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RAZUMOV and MARIA RAZUMOV
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv07760
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. WILSON
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE , GARY M. LANIGAN , MARK FARSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. D'LLIO
as 2:2015cv04018
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS WATSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RYAN v. D'LLIO et al
as 1:2015cv00056
Petitioner:
SAMUEL F. RYAN
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GODINEZ v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
as 2:2014cv07289
Petitioner:
RODOLFO GODINEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEPHEN D'LLIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DE JESUS v. D'LLIO
as 2:2014cv06494
Petitioner:
LUIS DE JESUS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. D'LLIO et al
as 1:2014cv05990
Petitioner:
RICHARD N. HILL
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARPER v. D'LLIO et al
as 1:2014cv05800
Petitioner:
CORDELL HARPER
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. D'LLIO et al
as 2:2014cv05289
Petitioner:
ANDRE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
