Cases 1 - 10 of 1,032
ZUPPO v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al.
as 4:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ZUPPO
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02447
Plaintiff:
Stephen Perkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tyler v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02439
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Tyler
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65543
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Steele, II
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2024cv02303
Petitioner:
DAVON L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, RYAN A. PFEFFERIE and KAITLYN C. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephens v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65399
Plaintiff:
Tim J. stephens
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elder v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65378
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elder
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
