Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 2:2022cv02783
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Dorsey and Unknown Superior Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, L.T. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Lt. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Unknown BOP Medical Staff
as 2:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown BOP Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2020cv02886
Defendant:
Archie Sanders and Ricky Wilkins
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
