Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bray Murray v. Superintendent Benner SCI, et al
as 15-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Bray Murray v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al
as 14-3919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI and others
Richard Ulrich v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al
as 14-3796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ULRICH
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI
In re: Jerome Loach, Sr., et al
as 14-2895
Petitioner:
In re: JEROME ALLEN LOACH, SR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Jerome Loach, Sr. v. Superintendent Benner SCI, et al
as 14-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME ALLEN LOACH, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Tyson Kint v. Superintendent Benner SCI
as 14-1879
Petitioner:
TYSON A. KINT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Clay Caldwell v. Superintendent Benner
as 14-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Buwlus Muhammad v. United States Attorney Western, et al
as 14-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI
William Daniels, Jr. v. Superintendent Benner SCI, et al
as 13-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. DANIELS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
