Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Abramenko et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 6:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
IGOR ABRAMENKO and SVETLANA ABRAMENKO
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Deppe v. Sovinski et al
as 6:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Dennis G. Deppe
Defendant:
Sandra M. Sovinski and Svetlana S. Shtrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06742
Plaintiff:
SVETLANA ROSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARO et al v. MAX MATHEWS RENTAL et al
as 3:2023cv06666
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARO, SVETLANA CARO and ANGELIQUE CARO
Defendant:
MAX MATHEWS RENTAL, MAX MATHEWS DEVELOPMENT INC and MAX MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aksenova v. Jersey City NJ USPS International Mail Distribution Center et al
as 6:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Aksenova
Defendant:
Jersey City NJ USPS International Mail Distribution Center, Jacksonville FL Network Distribution Center, Lake Mary FL Distribution Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Orlow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01973
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Anatoleyvna Orlow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
