Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Millhorn v. Swedish Covenant et al
as 9:2019cv80039
Defendant:
Hauser-Ross Eye Institute, Westmont Imaging Center, Quest Diagnostics and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn N. Millhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Millhorn v. Swedish Covenant Hospital et al
as 9:2018cv81722
Defendant:
Amita Health Adventist Medical Center, Chicago Fire Department, Swedish Covenant Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Nicole Millhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Barnes v. Wright et al
as 1:2016cv08460
Plaintiff:
Peter Barnes
Defendant:
Dr. Kelly Wright, Project Impact, Swedish Covenant Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scanlon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09618
Defendant:
United States of America , Northwest Memorial Healthcare, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Scanlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
All American Bank v. Mehta, et al.,
as 1:2011cv08835
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Snehal Mehta , Mahendra Mehta , Chicago Title Land Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INC et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INC, JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL, LORETTO HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
