Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019at00066
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Alliedsignal Inc., as success-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Standridge et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03183
Plaintiff:
Roy Standridge and Cynthia Standridge
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Anchor Darling Valve Company, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMATAGA v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62893
Plaintiff:
SOFALA AMATAGA, SOFALA AMATAGA, SOFALA AMATAGA and others
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUSSELL v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62892
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VERN RUSSELL
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DIAL v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62873
Plaintiff:
HERMAN DIAL
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., AVONDALE SHIPYARDS, INC., AVONDALE SHIPYARDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Amataga v. Raybestos-Manhattan, et al
as 3:1999cv02397
Plaintiff:
Sofala Amataga
Defendant:
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., ACandS, Inc., American Asbestos Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Russell v. Raybestos-Manhattan, et al
as 3:1999cv01822
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vern Russell
Defendant:
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Acands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dial v. Raybestos-Manhattan, et al
as 3:1997cv00952
Plaintiff:
Herman Dial
Defendant:
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Avondale Shipyards, Inc. , Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.