Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hite et al v. SSK Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Hannah Hite and Peyton Harp
Defendant:
SSK Transportation, LLC and Sajjad Saleem Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
GS Holistic, LLC v. Quraishi Business Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Quraishi Business Inc d/b/a 518 Smoke Shop, Sajjad Quraishi and Quraishi Business Inc doing business as 518 Smoke Shop
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
ALI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 4:2023cv01559
Plaintiff:
ALAA SALIH SUFAR ALI, ADAM MOHAMMED AL HADDAD, RASOOL MOHAMMED AL HADDAD and others
Defendant:
Director USCIS Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02480
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02199
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
