Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Wrinkl, Inc. v. Slack Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Wrinkl, Inc.
Defendant:
Slack Technologies, LLC and Salesforce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Applications In Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 24-1685
Plaintiff:
APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC
Defendant:
SALESFORCE, INC.
Roy v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lisbeth W. Roy
Defendant:
Salesforce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Keysoft, Inc. v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Keysoft, Inc.
Defendant:
Salesforce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Applications In Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 24-1133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SALESFORCE, INC.
Vilox Technologies, LLC et al v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 3:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
Vilox Technologies, LLC and Vilox, LLC
Defendant:
Salesforce, Inc.
Petitioner:
Dr. Joseph L. DeBellis
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Roy v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 3:2023cv04764
Defendant:
Salesforce.Com.Inc, Salesforce, Inc., Salesforce.com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lisabeth Roy and Dr. Lisbeth W. Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jane Doe (M.C.H.) v. Salesforce Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (M.C.H.)
Defendant:
Salesforce Inc, Backpage.com LLC and Carl Ferrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jane Doe (A.L.R.) v. Salesforce Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (A.L.R.)
Defendant:
Salesforce Inc, Backpage.com LLC and Carl Ferrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
