Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Infinity Corporate Centre, LLC, et al
as 12-4548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
INFINITY CORPORATE CENTRE, LLC and SAM A. CANNATA
Defendant:
JAMES PALMISANO, et al.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Infinity Corporate Centre LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02310
Defendant:
Infinity Corporate Centre LLC, James Palmisano, First S Family Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Embry, et al v. ACER America Corporation
as 12-15633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN EMBRY, individually and on behalf of himself, the general public and those similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
SAM P. CANNATA
Defendant - Appellee:
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a California corporation
Ramona Trombley, et al v. National City Bank, et al
as 11-7149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ramona Trombley, Brian Wells and Jeff Doehner, Individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
National City Bank and John Does 1-50
Interested Party - Appellant:
Sam P. Cannata
Shawndee Hartless, et al v. Clorox Company
as 11-55189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHAWNDEE HARTLESS, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public
Objector - Appellant:
SAM P. CANNATA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLOROX COMPANY
Independence Excavating, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02114
Plaintiff:
Independence Excavating, Inc.
Defendant:
Bridgeview Crossing, LLC, Snider-Cannata Interest, LLC, Huntington Bancshares, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arutyun Marsikian v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv04876
Plaintiff:
Arutyun Marsikian and Payam Saadat
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and DOES 1-500, inclusive
Not Classified By Court:
Sam P Cannata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
