Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39459
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMMY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Kingham, Jr. v. Ronald Tadlock, et al
as 18-11451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. KINGHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. TADLOCK, SAMMY HILL, TOMMY B. YOUNG and others
Kingham v. Tucker et al
as 8:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
John R. Kingham, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, Alex Taylor, Kristen Manalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Brimage v. Warden Sammy Hill
as 10-15116
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM BRIMAGE
Respondent - Appellee:
SAMMY HILL, Warden
Brimage v. Hill
as 1:2009cv23859
Plaintiff:
William Brimage
Defendant:
Sammy Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Sammy Hill, et al
as 8:2009cv02616
Petitioner:
Joseph Warren Clifton
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Sammy Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Sammy Hill, et al
as 6:2010cv00005
Petitioner:
Joseph Warren Clifton
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Sammy Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Hill et al
as 8:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Turner
Defendant:
Sammy Hill, FNU Peterson and FNU Holten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Hill et al
as 5:2008cv00036
Petitioner:
Edward Lewis Turner
Respondent:
Sammy Hill and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Hill et al
as 8:2008cv00164
Petitioner:
Edward Lewis Turner
Respondent:
Sammy Hill and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
