Cases 1 - 10 of 1,027
Williams v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc. doing business as Tucker Sam's Club #6409, ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Reed v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05260
Plaintiff:
Robert Reed
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc., Mark White, ABC Corps #1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Guantanamera Cigars Company v. SMCI Holding Inc., et al
as 23-12659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUANTANAMERA CIGARS COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC., SWEDISH MATCH NORTH AMERICA LLC, SAM'S WEST, INC. and others
VELASQUEZ v. SAM'S WEST, INC
as 9:2023cv81136
Plaintiff:
JESUS VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
SAM'S WEST, INC doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
MEDLEY v. SAM'S WEST INC
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MEDLEY
Defendant:
SAM'S WEST INC, SAM'S WEST INC doing business as SAMS CLUB and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
