Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAMSAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14515
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN RAMSAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HASTEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88596
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN HASTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENESKY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85618
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN JENESKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16101
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SAMUELL JOHN COCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DREYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04248
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN DREYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZANGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89266
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN ZANGER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87269
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simms, Jr. vs Govenor Charles Crist et al
as 4:2009cv10048
Plaintiff:
Samuel John Simms, Jr.
Defendant:
Govenor Charles Crist, Key West Ploice Department, Joseph Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Veles et al v. S.T.S., LLC
as 5:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Rodriguez Veles, John Rodriguez Veles, Baldemar Aguirre and others
Defendant:
S.T.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
