Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Faircloth v. Olens et al
as 1:2013cv01975
Plaintiff:
Don Robert Faircloth
Defendant:
Samuel S. Olens, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and Brian Owens
Edwards v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2013cv00053
Petitioner:
Carl Edwards, III
Respondent:
Rick Jacobs and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Polk County et al
as 4:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, Baldwin County, Randall Hines and others
Jones v. Bussy et al
as 3:2013cv00013
Respondent:
Bussy, FNU White and Samuel S. Olens
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Cert Team Member, FNU Blunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00014
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, FNU Telfair and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Bussy and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Cert Team Sergeant, FNU King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Barrow et al
as 1:2013cv00296
Petitioner:
Antonio Mathis
Respondent:
Donald Barrow and Samuel S. Olens
Jones v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Kevin G. Jones
Respondent:
Doug Williams and Samuel S. Olens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
