Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Lidia Rivera et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2015cv06511
Plaintiff:
Mary Cruz, Kenneth R Hansen, Enrique Molina and others
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. D, SFPP, L.P. and others
Sanchez v. Central Mortgage Company et al
as 4:2015cv03597
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sanchez
Defendant:
Central Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tsui v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2015cv03189
Plaintiff:
Kakit Tsui
Defendant:
Celso J. Sanchez and Frances R. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Medardo Rodriguez et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2015cv04890
Defendant:
Denise Anaya, Bristol Associates, LLC, Continental Financial Network and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Medardo Rodriguez and Claudia Sanchez
Pennymac Holdings LLC v. Cesar Morales et al
as 2:2015cv04782
Defendant:
Does, Cesar Morales and Miguel Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings LLC
Tsui v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2015cv02721
Plaintiff:
Kakit Tsui
Defendant:
Celso J. Sanchez, Frances R. Sanchez and Unnamed Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Guadalupe M. Roman et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv04344
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Does and The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe M Roman and Rosalinda A Sanchez
Rivera-v-Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv01842
Plaintiff:
Lidia Rivera , Everardo Rivera , Enrique Molina and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. , Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Vierua
as 5:2015cv01486
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Donna Vierua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Florencio P. Sanchez v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00530
Defendant:
Does, Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and The Law Offices of Les Zieve
Plaintiff:
Florencio P. Sanchez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
