Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Kay-Xiong Yang v. Scott Halloin, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
KAY-XIONG YANG
Defendant:
SCOTT R. HALLOIN, SHEILA L. SHADMAN EMERSON, MOLLY S. FITZGERALD and others
Little Sandy Coal Company, Inc v. CIR
as 21-3145
Petitioner / Appellant:
LITTLE SANDY COAL COMPANY, INC.
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sandy Point Dental, P.C. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 21-1420
Plaintiff:
BEND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Appellant:
SANDY POINT DENTAL, P.C.
Sandy Point Dental, P.C. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 21-1186
Defendant / Appellee:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDY POINT DENTAL, P.C.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES and UNITED POLICYHOLDERS
Eric Conner v. Jolinda Waterman, et al
as 19-2317
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDY MCARDLE, JOLINDA J. WATERMAN and NATHAN BETHEL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC D. CONNER
Gregory Aregood, Jr., et al v. Givaudan Flavors Corporation, et al
as 17-3390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY AREGOOD, JR., RICK ARNDT, SANDY ARNDT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GIVAUDAN FLAVORS CORPORATION, J. MANHEIMER, INC and JOHN DOES, 1-20
Lee Pitts v. Vincent Biskupic, et al
as 17-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE CARLTRAIL PITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT J. BISKUPIC and SANDY BALLOU
Lee Pitts v. Vincent Biskupic, et al
as 17-3275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE CARLTRAIL PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT J. BISKUPIC and SANDY BALLOU
Lee Pitts v. Vincent Biskupic, et al
as 17-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE CARLTRAIL PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT J. BISKUPIC and SANDY BALLOU
Lee Pitts v. Vincent Biskupic, et al
as 17-3241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE CARLTRAIL PITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT J. BISKUPIC and SANDY BALLOU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
