Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Sanford v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Angelique L Sanford and Angelique L. Sanford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Jacobson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
SANFORD JACOBSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanford v. Relentless Recovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanford
Defendant:
Relentless Recovery, Inc., Amy Osterling and David Osterling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doss v. Foley
as 1:2023cv00504
Petitioner:
Sanford Doss
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03531
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02907
Plaintiff:
Paul Sanford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanford et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
LARRY SANFORD and MABLE SANFORD
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04949
Plaintiff:
Sanford Ward, II
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilfoyle v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv01831
Defendant:
Lifetime Financial Growth of Northern Ohio, LLC, Matthew W. Roddy, Tasha J Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Kilfoyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
City of Sanford, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P.., et al
as 1:2019op45599
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sanford, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
