Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZP
as 23-70179
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official Capacity, WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, in his official capacity, MI FAMILIA VOTA and others
Petitioner:
BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official capacity
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Chuar LLC v. Rosan LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Chuar LLC
Defendant:
Rosan LLC, Mark Raymond Deliman, Estate of Mark Raymond Deliman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor:
BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
EIPCa, et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 21-56061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and others
Michael Ioane, et al v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 21-16104
Defendant / Appellee:
BA PROPERTIES, a Delaware Corporation, WILL CARRILLO, J. SHELDON CAPELOTO and others
Plaintiff:
PARADISE SOLUTIONS and SHELLY J. IOANE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. IOANE
Robert Lindow v. Darren Wallace, et al
as 21-15810
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE DEBORAH A. RYAN, in her capacity as presiding judge of Santa Clara Superior Court, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, a California government entity, MONICA PERKINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT O. LINDOW
Arizona Democratic Party, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 20-16766
Defendant:
DAVID STEVENS, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, SHARIE MILHEIRO, in her official capacity as Greenlee County Recorder, KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DSCC, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae:
RUSSELL BOWERS, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, KAREN FANN, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, STATE OF ALABAMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and others
Arizona Democratic Party, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 20-16759
Defendant:
DAVID STEVENS, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, SHARIE MILHEIRO, in her official capacity as Greenlee County Recorder, KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DSCC, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae:
RUSSELL BOWERS, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, KAREN FANN, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, STATE OF ALABAMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
