Cases 1 - 10 of 106
SALEM v. SUTTON
as 8:2024cv00287
In Re:
MOUSSY SALEM
Respondent:
SAUL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
SALEM v. SUTTON
as 8:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
MOUSSY SALEM
Respondent:
SAUL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
SALEM v. SUTTON
as 3:2024cv00289
Not Yet Classified:
MOUSSY SALEM
Respondent:
SAUL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
VANEGAS v. UTILIQUEST, LLC
as 3:2023cv23098
Plaintiff:
SAUL VANEGAS
Defendant:
UTILIQUEST, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LASSOFF et al v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC.
as 1:2023cv20997
Plaintiff:
Saul Lassoff, Shirley Lassoff and SAMUEL LASSOFF
Defendant:
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LASSOFF et al v. MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2023cv20419
Plaintiff:
Saul Lassoff and Shirley Lassoff
Defendant:
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL and CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES, LTD. et al v. DOES et al
as 2:2023cv04180
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES, LTD., W. AXL ROSE, MICHAEL MCKAGAN and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, JANE DOES and ABC COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BOUNDS et al v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
BOUNDS LEVIN, REGINALD BOUNDS and GINA LEVIN
Defendant:
SAUL SCHWARTZ, UNKNOWN CONCEALED and 531 STETSON LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
