Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Voter Reference Foundation, LLC v. Schmidt
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Voter Reference Foundation, LLC
Defendant:
Albert Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Castro v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Al Schmidt and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY V. SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC. ET AL
as 2:2021cv01304
Petitioner:
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC., GARY E. SCHMIDT, THERESE SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MMG Insurance Company v. Schmidt Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
MMG Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schmidt Landscaping, Inc., Gary E. Schmidt, Therese Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JUSTICE, II v. 1LIFE HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03612
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
1LIFE HEALTHCARE, INC., AMIR DAN RUBIN, PAUL R AUVIL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUBIN v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv02066
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUBIN
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JONATHAN SYMONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DAUGHERTY et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL P. ADAMS , DAVID J. BECKER , ROBERT J. BOBACK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
