Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Welco Manufacturing Company, Murco Wall Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Norvelle et al v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03525
Plaintiff:
Ronald Norvelle, Norvelle Enterprises, Inc. and Faith Hibbard
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Square D. Company, Jeffrey O. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perakslis v. 3M Co. et al
as 3:2011cv01111
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perakslis
Defendant:
3M Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hogan v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2011cv00945
Defendant:
3M Company, Cessna Aircraft Company, Globe Holding Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William H Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Grelson v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv06063
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Rapid American Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Grelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
