Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Bailey v. Doyle et al
as 2:2016cv02577
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Bailey
Defendant:
Ashley Doyle, Jacqueline McDougle, Jeff Gatlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Centurion et al
as 1:2016cv01150
Plaintiff:
Omowale A. Shabazz
Defendant:
Centurion, Derrick Schofield, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doyle et al
as 2:2016cv02417
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Defendant:
Ashley Doyle, C. Jones, Theus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv02358
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Doug Cook, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Haslam et al
as 2:2016cv02346
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Derrick Schofield, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2016cv02305
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settle v. Phillips et al
as 2:2016cv02320
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Derrick Schofield and Douglas Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joy v. Rogers et al
as 1:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Tavares Joy
Defendant:
Patrick Rogers, Bill Haslam, D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Schofield et al
as 1:2016cv01049
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Kennedy
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, James Holloway, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin and Michael Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
William Bryant, Stanley Dickerson, James Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
