Cases 1 - 10 of 271
(PC) Adkins v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv03794
Defendant:
D. Potts, J. Schultz, H. Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Garcia v. Schultz
as 2:2024cv03695
Petitioner:
Elias Garcia
Respondent:
Jason Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parra et al v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Boxlunch et al
as 2:2024cv10488
Defendant:
Torrid, LLC and Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Boxlunch
Plaintiff:
Danielle Shelley, Chassie Schultz and Candace Parra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Reese v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv03359
Defendant:
A. Hennigan, CDCR, G. Skelton and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Ryan Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvin Deshawn Cage v. Jason Schultz
as 2:2024cv09955
Respondent:
Jason Schultz
Petitioner:
Marvin Deshawn Cage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Perreira v. Schultz
as 2:2024cv03117
Respondent:
Jason Schultz
Petitioner:
Brandon M. Perreira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd Vincent Davie v. Jason Schultz
as 2:2024cv09563
Petitioner:
Todd Vincent Davie
Respondent:
Jason Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rechard Roberts v. Jason Schultz
as 2:2024cv09240
Respondent:
Jason Schultz
Petitioner:
Rechard Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schultz v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01921
Defendant:
Navilyst Medical, Inc. and Angiodynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
