Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Anzovino v. Pallito et al
as 5:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michelle Anzovino
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito , P. Mark Potonas , Christopher P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Richmond
as 1:2014mc00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott A. Richmond
Garnishee:
Kaman Composites-Vermont
Latterell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Latterell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Latterell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Latterell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thurston v. Pallito et al
as 5:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thurston
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Scott Morley and Bob Arkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Isenor et al
as 2:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Martin Demetrio Morales
Defendant:
Scott Isenor, Joshua Rutherford, Mark Potanas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Scott Yates
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Isham v. Mumley
as 2:2013mc00034
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. Isham
Defendant:
Scott Mumley
Counter_claimant:
Scott Mumley
Counter_defendant:
Kimberly J. Isham
Casey et al v. Pallito et al
as 5:2012cv00284
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Casey and Martin Demetrio Morales
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Vermont Department of Corrections, Northwest State Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkman v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael A. Kirkman
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections , Andrew Pallito , Rose Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
