Cases 101 - 110 of 398
Kenard Thomas v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 20-16443
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, NICHOLAS RUSSELL and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENARD THOMAS
(PC) Todd v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2020cv01442
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Britton, B. Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59833
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Asoau v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01344
Plaintiff:
Matthew Asoau
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Davis v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01347
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Scott Jones Sheriff's Dept and Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Faletui v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01342
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Scott Jones and Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Lewis Faletui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32477
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26940
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Kanongataa v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv01116
Defendant:
James Root, Emily Dahkle, Children's Receiving Home and others
Plaintiff:
Grame Kali Kanongataa and Grame Kali Kanongata'a
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hunter, et al v. Scott Jones, et al
as 20-15990
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON, Badge #713 and SCOTT JONES
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE FOWLER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
