Cases 1 - 10 of 21
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Oak Grove Management Company v. EPA, et al
as 16-1206
Petitioner:
Oak Grove Management Company, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73170
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Intervenor:
FLORENCE COPPER, INC.
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73168
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Intervenor:
FLORENCE COPPER, INC.
Sierra Club, et al v. EPA, et al
as 18-60116
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and ENTERGY LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. EPA, et al
as 18-60102
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GULF RESTORATION NETWORK and LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ANNE IDSAL, Region 6 Administrator
Safer Chem Healthy Families, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73390
Petitioner:
SAFER CHEMICALS HEALTHY FAMILIES, ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY CENTER and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
EDF v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73383
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Intervenor:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, AMERICAN COATINGS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COKE AND COAL CHEMICALS INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73170
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73168
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
