Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination
Cook v. City of Arvada, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv00212
Plaintiff:
Travis Cook
Defendant:
Scott Thomas, City of Arvada, Colorado, Ryan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Swanson Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01131
Defendant:
Swanson Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mollie McCarthy and J. Scott Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc
Montgomery v. Thomas et al
as 1:2018cv00556
Plaintiff:
David Montgomery
Defendant:
Scott Thomas and Tim Kuenning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. S/W Tax Loans, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation
Defendant:
S/W Tax Loans, Inc , J Thomas Development of NM, Inc. , Jeffrey Scott Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv03189
Plaintiff:
Marquise Harris
Defendant:
Scott Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Scott Thomas Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02534
Plaintiff:
North American Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Scott Thomas Construction Company, Inc., Scott Thomas and Chriss Walther-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Smith et al
as 2:2009mc00216
Plaintiff:
Merrily A. Stone
Defendant:
Scott Thomas Smith and Neysa Lissette Smith
Arunakul et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2007cv02450
Plaintiff:
Punya Arunakul, MD, Srichandra Noy Arunakul and Star Insurance Company
Defendant:
Scott Thomas and Darrell Jindra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
