Cases 1 - 10 of 23
USA v. Kevin Thompson
as 24-11290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN SCOTT THOMPSON
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04898
Plaintiff:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott Thompson v. Sheriff, Pinellas County FL, et al
as 22-10754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, PINELLAS COUNTY FL, SEAN GILROY, individually and RANDY SHEPHERD, individually
RUSS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SCOTT THOMPSON, RYAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Randy Shepherd, Bob Gualtieri, Sean Gilroy and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05732
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT THOMPSON II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64487
Plaintiff:
VERNON SCOTT THOMPSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80850
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42380
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03192
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
